[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Check for redundancy
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Check for redundancy |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:10:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:21:03PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The term is not specific to programming: expressing things which have been
> > expressed already.
>
> Obviously, Drew knows that. The issue is that if you want to check for
> redundancy in code, it's presumably by doing it with another piece of
> code [...]
To throw an unorthodox idea into the air, one could measure the compression
ratio (e.g. with gzip) and relate it to the compression ratio of "known
good" code (I know, I know... :-)
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlWLHNkACgkQBcgs9XrR2ka1MACeKYaTDS3aNmfwnO2JSYAVmXKx
qfMAnj5A+eSEkW0UNdALNolFk1CoEIUc
=6Zpf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- RE: Check for redundancy, Drew Adams, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, Andreas Röhler, 2015/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy,
tomas <=
- Re: Check for redundancy, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/24
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/25
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/26
- Re: Check for redundancy, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/27
- Re: Check for redundancy, tomas, 2015/06/28
- Re: Check for redundancy, Emanuel Berg, 2015/06/28