[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using use-package
From: |
Rusi |
Subject: |
Re: using use-package |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:34:26 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 11:27:57 AM UTC+5:30, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2015-08-04 22:35 -0700, Rusi wrote:
>
> > I will be teaching programming again. I would really appreciate if I
> > can 'hand-out' pieces of config that are shorter, neater,
> > less-interdependent than my higgledy-piggledy init-mess
>
> That way lies Ubuntu - an ancient African word meaning "much simpler
> than the simplest possible".
>
> :-P
I get that you are making a joke... But I dont get it :-(
Is it that...
- Using use-package oversimplifies?
- Inits can only be higgledy-piggledy messes?
- Just use the emacs packages from ubuntu and to hell with emacs-packages
(from emacs)?
- More interdependent is better? [Yeah some out here prefer let* to let ]
- Re: using use-package, Rusi, 2015/08/05
- Re: using use-package, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: using use-package,
Rusi <=
- Re: using use-package, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: using use-package, Rusi, 2015/08/05
- Re: using use-package, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: using use-package, Rusi, 2015/08/06
- Re: using use-package, Grant Rettke, 2015/08/07
- Message not available
- Re: using use-package, Rusi, 2015/08/07
- Re: using use-package, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/08
- Re: using use-package, Grant Rettke, 2015/08/09
- Re: using use-package, Phillip Lord, 2015/08/10
- Re: using use-package, Stefan Monnier, 2015/08/10