|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: plists, alists, and hashtables |
Date: | Wed, 05 Aug 2015 16:45:38 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
RT> There may be alternatives though. For example, instead of: RT> #s(hash-table size 65 test eql rehash-size 1.5 rehash-threshold 0.8 data ()) RT> We could have a shorthand, perhaps #s(h data) Is it really sufficiently better than the currently supported syntaxes such as #s(hash-table data (a 2 b 3)) or ((a . 2) (b . 3)) ? I think it's going to be hard to convince that the few use cases will be enough to justify all the work. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |