[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nested defsubst?
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: nested defsubst? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:15:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <mailman.8058.1439176228.904.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> wrote:
> Is it useful? That is, if I do this:
>
> (defsubst foo ()
> "foo")
>
> (defsubst foobar ()
> (concat (foo) "bar"))
>
> will foobar contain an inlined copy of foo, _and_ will subsequent calls
> to foobar be inlined?
Yes to both.
To determine this, compile them and then use M-x disassemble to see
whether it's inlined.
(defun use-foobar () (foobar))
M-x compile-defun
M-x disassemble use-foobar
byte code for use-foobar:
args: nil
0 constant "foo"
1 constant "bar"
2 concat2
3 return
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- nested defsubst?, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/08/09
- Re: nested defsubst?,
Barry Margolin <=