help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE


From: tomas
Subject: Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:46:53 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:52:10AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> writes:
> 
> > The main disadvantage for me is that news articles
> > are read only. This means I cannot locally correct
> > misbehaviour such as broken threads (which happens
> > all the time in _this_ list, "thanks" to Mailman and
> > its broken news gateway).
> >
> > Another disadvantage, and I admit it's a more
> > theoretical one, is that every remote service will
> > go away someday. In the case of gmane it will not be
> > only the current article feed, but also the
> > archives. If you rely on it exclusively, all the
> > information in historical articles will be gone.
> 
> So one disadvantage is theoretical. And the
> other: hysterical?

I was going to do a harsh rebuff. After all, to me it's
pretty understandable that someone wishes to take their
archiving decisions themselves. Calling that "hysterical"
is... borderline insult.

OTOH, and somewhat independently, Gmane seems to belong
to the Good Folks(TM).

regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlYCZv0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaIdACeIg8AAAj5CYkIe7oMxxXNP4cb
9vEAn15FjM6s536c0QCQLIQ79N6swfRQ
=ZUj7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]