[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2015 03:26:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>> I don't think you can be categorical about it.
>
> Of course I can. Though maybe I shouldn't. ;-)
"Ho ho ho" - I heard that one in the
techno-incubator...
>> (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (point))
>> and
>> (line-beginning-position)
>> The code is easier and faster to write, read, and understand.
> Is it really clear? I'm not sure.
It consists of fewer letters and the words express the
return value explicitly. With
(save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (point))
you have a combination of three different
forms/functions with Emacs-specific lingo at that, and
that combination/lingo has to make sense to you.
> Besides, I've just checked the /implementation/ of
> `line-beginning-position', and I have some bad news
> for you. I'm not fluent in C, nut AFAICT, it's even
> uglier than the Elisp variant: there is no
> `save-excursion' just a temporary variable for the
> original position of point
So it does move point? The help says "This function
does not move point." - that might refer to the user
experience and not the implementation tho. (So the
user knows he doesn't have to enclose it with
`save-excursion'.)
> So, how is the C `line-beginning-position' better than
>
> (defun elisp-line-beginning-position ()
> (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (point)))?
>
> (apart from being less general)? It is just /faster/,
> but not more /elegant/ or /pure/.
It is less general (i.e., more to the, eh, "point") -
but it is also more general since it is included in
the vanilla Emacs.
As for elegance and purity those algorithms from the
religio-mythical age are discontinued.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Rolf Ade, 2015/11/18
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/18
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/18
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/18
- Message not available
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Rolf Ade, 2015/11/19
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/11/19
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/19
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/11/20
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-space?, Rolf Ade, 2015/11/19
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-space?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/20
- Message not available
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-space?, Rolf Ade, 2015/11/20
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-space?, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/23
- Message not available
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-space?, Rolf Ade, 2015/11/20
- Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Alex Bennée, 2015/11/26
- predicates (was: Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?), Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: predicates, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/11/26
- Re: predicates, Emanuel Berg, 2015/11/27
Re: How to test if the current line contains only white-spache?, Yuri Khan, 2015/11/16