[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file
From: |
Haines Brown |
Subject: |
Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:01:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:02:39PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > > > Why Jessie is being identified as Wheezy is another question.
> > > > > > Is there any reason why you might get identified as Ubuntu
> > > > > > 12.04? Another of the things that has just dropped off Google's
> > > > > > cliff.
> > > > Glad we have solved the mystery - though sadly not your problem. :-(
> > >
> > > A potential solution to the problem would be Jessie proper, but without
> > > systemd. It seems to work rather well, in fact, from what people doing
> > > so say. I am about to cross my fingers and try it myself.
> > > Lisi
> > In thinking about it, I'm not sure now if I installed the devuan ISO or
> > debian Jessie and then removed systemd. As I tell my wife, I always am
> > thinking about higher things! How would I know at this point which I
> > did?
> But if you installed Jessie proper without systemd you shouldn't be
> having the Google-Chrome problems - and we are back to square one!!
> Lisi
That's a third option: remove systemd from jessie, install jessie
without systemd (not sure to do it), and devuan. My question remains,
however, albeit OT, how do I figure out which option I used? Uname -a
tells me the system is debian.
Haines
- Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file,
Haines Brown <=