|
| From: | Glenn Morris |
| Subject: | Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers] |
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2016 12:46:43 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> is it (roughly) consensus here to "reply to all" instead of replying >> to list? > > Either one is okay. I'm so sure that reply-to-all is correct that I thought it was official policy for GNU lists. I don't understand why people think "recipient might get two copies" is worse than "recipient might get no copies". Especially when the former issue is trivially avoided by Mailman or MUA duplication suppression.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |