[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers]
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers] |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:44:36 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; GNU x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 |
On 04/06/16 22:41, Bob Proulx wrote:
Yes. I have tried to determine why this is before. I don't think it
is on Emanuel's end.
I did not imply it either, of course. However, if the problematic
software or service might be avoided, it’d better be avoided, I believe.
But it have to be found first, of course.
Details follow
Good investigation. :-)
There is no In-Reply-To on the follow-up. Only the References header
can be used for threading. Checking through the references in the
place of my message 20160603195221435910074@bob.proulx.com I see
mailman.789.1465006376.1216.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org instead. That
appears to be the point where threading gets broken. Something
appears to have converted one message id into another one.
<...>
Again Gnus and News. Can't tell.
Ah! Here is one. Another example of a broken mail link.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2016-02/threads.html#00390
Original:
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-Id: <83mvqmd1mo.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <2b5da096-ab4d-4803-9a62-dbed5c036514@googlegroups.com>
Follow-up:
From: Vladimir Panteleev <thecybershadow@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9f89c7fe-19e2-4d24-89f9-630d830f8b67@googlegroups.com>
Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:217048
References: <2b5da096-ab4d-4803-9a62-dbed5c036514@googlegroups.com>
<mailman.6021.1456560027.843.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6021.1456560027.843.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
What User-Agent is represented by "G2/1.0"?
From the ‘Path’ header I can guess that this is Google Groups web
interface [0].
[0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gnu.emacs.help
Since that isn't Gnus it would seem to let Gnus off the hook. The
commonality is the Stanford news gateway. The converted message id is
of the same form. Looks to be the same problem. Does not include
Gnus so seems to implicate the Stanford newsgroup gateway.
I’ll try to post this message to ‘gnu.emacs.help‘ via a proper news
server (news.gnus.org) and not with Gnus, let see what will happen.
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], (continued)
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/03
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/03
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/03
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/06/04
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/04
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/04
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/05
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/05
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Stefan Monnier, 2016/06/04
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/06/05
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers],
Dmitry Alexandrov <=
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/06/05
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/05
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/06/08
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/09
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/15
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/16
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/06
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/06
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Emanuel Berg, 2016/06/06
- Re: Reply to list [was: Different key maps in different dired buffers], Bob Proulx, 2016/06/04