|
From: | René Kuligowski |
Subject: | Re: Questions: classical X embedding, vc for Fossil |
Date: | Thu, 08 Dec 2016 10:20:35 -0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121215 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11 |
Me again, Forgot one thing: On 08.12.2016 09:51, René Kuligowski wrote: (…)
concerning the X-embedding: yes, it matters, in a way –– why embed an own DocView pane for DVI/PDF- and image-viewing, but staying there when it would be easy *and* make sense to do the same for the three browsers (w3, w3m, eww) to use the full capabilities of a graphical pane instead of a textual one. IMHO the GTK3-Webkit-widget-embedding is sort of a short-circuited action without any sense or purpose and should have been replaced with native X pane/widget embedding.…for, eg., an AuCTeX/syncTeX preview pane, an embedded xterm as fully-capable shell launched by eshell-visual-command, using X-widgets for customize, ses, etc. The possibillities are almost endless. Think about it, it makes sense.
Again, best regards, ;-)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |