Re: Changing the factor used in universal arugment

[Emanuel Berg]

john@ankarstrom.se (John Ankarström) writes:

> C-2 is arguably simpler than C-u 2, as the latter
> requires more keypresses

C-u is more general because after that whatever digit
can follow. It is much more useful to get used to and
get into the muscle memory.

C-2 is unergonomic, at least on my keyboard.

The C-2s and M-2s, etc., doesn't work in a console or
-nw Emacs instance without the workaround. And if you
do it, probably you want to use it for something
better than replicate the C-u functionality which is
readily available.

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573