[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is BSD licence compatible to export with emacs modules?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Is BSD licence compatible to export with emacs modules? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:20:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 05:26:51PM +0200, Arthur Miller wrote:
> Just a short question: if I wrap a bsd-licensed code into n emacs module,
> is it compatible
> with GPL license? Is it OK to export with
>
> int plugin_is_GPL_compatible;
>
> Does that symbol aim at my own written module code, or does it even include
>
> used 3rd party code (which in this case is licenced under the BSD licence)?
Yes. BSD is GPL compatible [1]. ( assume it's the currently common "modified"
or "three-clause" license [2] and not the original, four-clause license [4],
which is pretty uncommon these days. The four-clause license has this non-
advertising clause.
Cheers
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#GPLCompatibleLicenses
[2] https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD_3Clause
[3] https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD_4Clause
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAll6WQ0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYQNgCfdZLuqzrw7xvx7Tx5R3AkJmIF
xzAAnApo+y4iBrBlZn1KHGcM4deuAiYX
=WROV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----