[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Box cursor at EoL
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Box cursor at EoL |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:07:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> To git (and most version control systems), a change is
> a change. The patch history should not be cluttered with
> changes that don't change anything.
It think they could and should be tweaked so that such
changes, which should be easy to do in this case at least,
should not be considered changes.
But even more to the point, if trailing whitespace don't
change anything, why have them _at all_?
>> And even so, if we set Emacs to behave as I suggest (always
>> remove them), wouldn't that mean _less_ such changes are
>> reported (occur) in the long run?
>
> No, because not every developer on a project uses emacs.
> Their loss!
But other editors, and also the VCS that you mention, could
auto-remove them as well, I'm sure.
After that, why introduce them? Problem solved.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, (continued)
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/08
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2022/10/08
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/08
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/08
- Re: Box cursor at EoL, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2022/10/09
Re: Box cursor at EoL, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/05
Re: Box cursor at EoL, Dr Rainer Woitok, 2022/10/06
Re: Box cursor at EoL, Emanuel Berg, 2022/10/06
Re: Box cursor at EoL, Anders Munch, 2022/10/18
Re: Box cursor at EoL, Anders Munch, 2022/10/18