Re[2]: [Help-gnunet] Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet 0.6.0a released

[Hendrik Pagenhardt]

> Hmm. Did you use "run -d" when starting gnunetd in gdb? Some versions
> of glibc are known to cause trouble with gdb, which in this case would
> clearly be unfortunate.

I tried with set args -d, but now I run it again with run -d and it
seems to work so far. I'll just have to wait until it crashes again...

The current errors follow (I removed the output about wrong SKEYs, as
they are not time related to the actual crashes):

./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  4351 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 08:32:40 CEST 2003
Oct 10 08:35:17 FATAL: pthread_mutex_lock returned 22 (Invalid argument) in 
routing.c:996
Oct 10 08:35:17 __BREAK__ at logging.c:220
Fri Oct 10 08:35:27 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  4562 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 08:39:02 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  4653 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 08:41:17 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  4785 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 08:43:39 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  4949 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:21:13 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  6469 Segmentation fault      gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:23:06 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  6737 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:24:49 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  6900 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:27:17 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  7091 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:37:09 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  7552 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 09:39:06 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  7853 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 10:06:04 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5:  9000 Segmentation fault      gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 10:58:05 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 10134 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 11:10:18 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 10409 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 11:13:08 CEST 2003
Oct 10 11:15:07 FATAL: knapsack error
Oct 10 11:15:07 __BREAK__ at logging.c:220
Fri Oct 10 11:15:17 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 10535 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 13:25:07 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 14908 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 13:32:10 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 15176 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 13:34:21 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 15239 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 13:37:57 CEST 2003
Oct 10 15:08:05 FATAL: pthread_mutex_unlock returned 1 (Operation not 
permitted) in statuscalls.c:537
Oct 10 15:08:05 __BREAK__ at logging.c:220
Fri Oct 10 15:08:15 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 17285 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 15:11:52 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 17300 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 15:16:15 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 17315 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 16:48:18 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 19401 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 17:12:27 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 19677 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 17:30:06 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 19697 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 18:31:44 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 19740 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 18:34:13 CEST 2003
./rungnunet.sh: line 5: 19751 Killed                  gnunetd -d
Fri Oct 10 19:00:58 CEST 2003dated the CVS version

> I hacked on the knapsack last night, maybe I broke something (likely).

Well a knapsack error occured...

> I'm just talking to Filip who is the remaining roadblock towards
> releasing 0.2.6 (ok, right, I'm just waiting for his code which will
> port LE to OSX :-).

That's fine, I just wanted to point out this potential problem.

Ciao,
     Hendrik