Re: [Help-gnunet] 0.9.5a working for anyone?

[Christian Grothoff]

The problem is (most likely) that at this time quite a few peers already
run SVN HEAD with the ECC-based public keys, which is not compatible 
with 0.9.5a.  We also saw some of these warnings before introducing ECC,
but as we were planning to switch to ECDHE anyway, I never made an 
effort to really track this one down (as it was an 'infrequent' tricky
bug, and all of the code this relates to is now gone).

So yes, it is possible that 0.9.5a is already defunct, as SVN HEAD broke 
compatibility.

-Christian

On 05/11/2013 08:02 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've troubles connecting to any peer at all with 0.9.5a, in gnu/linux x86_64.
>
> Enabling log shows me a bunch of:
> May 08 22:39:12-827091 util-20835 INFO Trying to connect to `204.9.5.51:2086'
> (0x15c0070)
> May 08 22:39:13-226199 util-20835 WARNING RSA signature verification failed at
> crypto_rsa.c:1344: Bad signature
> May 08 22:39:13-226381 transport-20835 WARNING Invalid signature on address
> tcp:204.9.5.51:2086 from peer `II17'
> May 08 22:39:13-804288 util-20835 INFO Trying to connect to
> `134.210.214.138:2086' (0x15aac40)
> May 08 22:39:14-984154 util-20835 WARNING RSA signature verification failed at
> crypto_rsa.c:1344: Bad signature
> May 08 22:39:14-984305 transport-20835 WARNING Invalid signature on address
> udp:204.9.5.51:2086 from peer `II17'
>
> The test_crypto_rsa runs fine. test_crypto_ecc too.
>
> Regards,
> Lluís.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnunet mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnunet