GCC C++ vs. GCC Java Performance

[Alex Vinokur]

"Alex Vinokur" <alexvn@bigfoot.com> wrote in message 
news:15eacd17.0406192342.3c5f2480@posting.google.com...
> gaurav_7_7@yahoo.com (Gaurav) wrote in message 
> news:<7113e26f.0406152345.2f01b86c@posting.google.com>...
> > http://www.sys-con.com/story/print.cfm?storyid=45250
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gaurav
>
>
> <QUOTE from http://www.sys-con.com/story/print.cfm?storyid=45250>
[snip]
> The results he got were that Java is significantly faster than
> optimized C++ in many cases.
> </QUOTE>
>
> It seems that last sentence should be as following:
>
> "The results he got were that Sun Java 1.4.2_01 compiler is
> significantly faster than optimized G++ (GCC) 3.3.1 20030930 (with
> glibc 2.3.2-98)in many cases."
>
> In other words the tests are not "C++ vs. Java Performance", but
> "Optimized G++ (GCC) 3.3.1 20030930 (with glibc 2.3.2-98) vs. Sun Java
> 1.4.2_01 Performance".
>
[snip]

GCC C++ vs. GCC Java Performance Testsuites can be see at
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.test/msg/2c24df566657e2ce

It seems that GCC Java is not faster than GCC C++ .

-- 
   Alex Vinokur
     http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html
     http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn