[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: errno bug?
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: errno bug? |
Date: |
06 Oct 2004 07:29:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
Maurizio Loreti <mlo@foobar.it> writes:
> For completeness:
And for more completeness (SUSv3):
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/errno.html
[...]
Issue 5
The following sentence is deleted from the DESCRIPTION: "The
value of errno is 0 at program start-up, but is never set to
0 by any XSI function". The DESCRIPTION also no longer states
that conforming implementations may support the declaration:
extern int errno;
Issue 6
Obsolescent text regarding defining errno as:
extern int errno
is removed.
Text regarding no function setting errno to zero to indicate an
error is changed to no function shall set errno to zero. This
is for alignment with the ISO/IEC 9899:1999 standard.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Maurizio Loreti, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Thomas Maeder, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Maurizio Loreti, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Thomas Maeder, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/06
- Re: errno bug?, Ross Smith, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, Ulrich Eckhardt, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, E. Robert Tisdale, 2004/10/07
- Re: errno bug?, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2004/10/06