[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No standard library compilation
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: No standard library compilation |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:03:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
"ernesto" <ebasconp@gmail.com> writes:
> I want to develop a C++ application (or shared library) [using objects,
> inheritance, polymorphism, RTTI, templates, exception handling, etc.]
> but I do not want to use the libstdc++ library.
Why not?
Whatever the reason, you'll have to implement *a lot* of C++
runtime support, which is quite non-trivial.
> I know that I can avoid linking with the default libraries telling
> "-nodefaultlibs" to the compiler, but then a lot of errors are raised.
>
> So, what basic methods should I implement in order to have full C++
> features on my application without using the libstdc++?
Whichever methods are reported as unresolved when you link with
-nodefaultlibs.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.