[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member functions in several libraries
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: member functions in several libraries |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:41:31 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
Kyuso Cahi <kyuso@softhome.net> writes:
A. Because doing so makes the conversation harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?
Please do not top-post.
> Does this mean
Does *what* mean?
It isn't clear what your question has to do with the message you
are replying to.
> I can't store member functions of the same class
> across several libraries?
You sure can.
> I would like to interchangeably link different implementation of a member
> function stored in different libraries.
Fine.
> Is there a better solution?
Better in what respect?
You didn't say what you don't like about the "store in different
libraries" solution, so it's hard to tell whether there is a
better one.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.