[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [UX] real names exposed
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [UX] real names exposed |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:11:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:25:49PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> I understand why this happens:
>
> % khal --help
> Usage: .khal-real [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]...
> [...]
>
> but I think it sorta sucks for user experience. Just thought I'd point this
> out, and I was wondering if there were any ideas to address this.
>
> Specifically, argv[0] references the name of the "real" executable, rather
> than
> the guix wrapper. This is almost always benign, but it looks ugly in help
> menus.
I wonder if the Khal author (Christian) intends for users to rename the
executable. Otherwise, why use argv[0]? Is it some side-effect of a
documentation tool used by Khal?
I would understand if khal and ikhal were the same executable, and
behavior was changed based on argv[0], but that's not the case.
It does look ugly.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature