[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
libmachuser vs libmach
From: |
James Morrison |
Subject: |
libmachuser vs libmach |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:17:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi,
I've been looking though some of the mach interfaces and libmach is
mentioned
in a few places. This looks to be libmachuser for us, is this correct?
I'm also curious about the machine_slot_data_t type, the comment says it is
bogus, but the interface for xxx_slot_info uses machine_slot_data_t instead of
machien_slot_t, should this be fixed? Also is there any reason that the
function
to get the function to get more information about a processor is prefixed with
xxx?
=====
James Morrison
University of Waterloo
Computer Science - Digital Hardware
2A co-op
http://hurd.dyndns.org
Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
- libmachuser vs libmach,
James Morrison <=