[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 03:33:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Scribit Ivan Shmakov dies 03/02/2007 hora 12:49:
> > Also will it support hard links for directories?
> My opinion that it /shouldn't/ be done. If one thinks of a directory
> as a mapping of file names to actual file objects, and of hard links
> as the alternate names to a file (directory) object, then it becomes
> hard to decide, which file (directory) the `..' name is mapped to?
Current shells already bypass the '..' entry of directories and in fact
use some lexical rules to find the parent directory.
Quickly,
Pierre
--
nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, (continued)
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/04
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Shams, 2007/02/04
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/06
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/07
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/07
- symbolic links & `..' entry, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/08
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/08
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/10
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/02/10
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/11
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features,
Pierre THIERRY <=
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/02/03