|
From: | Fred Metcalf |
Subject: | Re: recursion and fsolve |
Date: | Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:15:29 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 MultiZilla/1.6.4.0b |
I did "edit" the .oct code and there are numerous references to "fsolve" in the binary, and these would probably have to be changed. Of course, as has been pointed out, the heart of fsolve is off in Fortran 77 land, and that's perhaps the part that has to be invoked with a different name.
Fred Metcalf Joe Koski wrote:
Would it be possible to copy the .oct file to the local directory, rename it, and use it as if it were a separate function? Would the calling sequence somehow mess that up? Joe Koski on 8/4/04 2:57 PM, John W. Eaton at address@hidden wrote:On 4-Aug-2004, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote: | Should a patch like that in this message be sufficient? Want to try it | with a test case.. No, because the core of fsolve is written in Fortran 77 and that doesn't allow recursion. jwe ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |