[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
octave with gcc4 done!
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
octave with gcc4 done! |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:14:01 -0500 |
On 18-Feb-2005, Dmitri A. Sergatskov <address@hidden> wrote:
| After all patches that John sent to me, I have compiled
| octave-2.1.65 with gcc4/gfortran:
That's good news, though I would still like to see the problems fixed
in the compiler rather than patch Octave unless we know that there
really is non-standard code or outright bugs in Octave.
Also, I thought there was an internal compiler error for one of the
files. How did you get around that?
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, (continued)
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Joe Koski, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/18
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib, Paul Thomas, 2005/02/19
- Re: gfortran vs ranlib > to octave and gfortran lists, Paul Thomas, 2005/02/19
- octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
- octave with gcc4 done!,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
- Re: octave with gcc4 done!, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/19
g++-4 vs. gperf (was: FYI: compiling octave with gcc4 (no go)), John W. Eaton, 2005/02/18