|
From: | David Bateman |
Subject: | Re: version & csvread |
Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:31:04 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
address@hidden a écrit :
Well 2.1.x is a dead-end is the real sense that only bug-fixes have been applied to it since 2.1.64 and the development has been happening in 2.9.x. At the point where a 2.9.x release is blessed as "testing" by John I don't expect that another 2.1.x release will happen. Whether such a blessed release of 2.9.x will happen soon not or depends on whether John is interested in stabilizing the existing 2.9 stuff or getting more of the features on the 3.0 todo list into 2.9. For now stay with 2.1.71, though in reality I find even the latest CVS of 2.9 to be quite stable...Hi, I am running into a problem with csvread & both tab-delimited and comma-separated values files. The files are read in as having one row too many. So far I've successfully eliminated whitespaces and strings, and I've confirmed that the files are read correctly in Matlab. Searching & Googling haven't resulted in much csvread/write info since about 2004, and there doesn't seem to be a definite "error here" -- does my problem sound familiar to anybody? In more general terms, is it better to run 2.1.71 or 2.9.3? David called 2.1.71 a "dead end", but the Octave page recommends that non-developer users should use that. I'm a newbie to Matlab, octave, & fink (and the command line, actually), so... who knows? It might be relevant that I have access to Matlab via a desktop at work, but I would really like to analyze my data (via octave) on my Mac.
Regards David ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |