[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: puzzling Octave behaviour
From: |
Muthiah Annamalai |
Subject: |
Re: puzzling Octave behaviour |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:34:20 -0500 |
Hi there,
> It's always hard to debug with Octave, but this is just plain silly:
as hard as writing good code in my opinion.
> debug> disp(arg(ltest(1:10)))
debug> disp(arg(ltmps(1:10)) == arg(ltest(1:10)))
>I feel like being cheated on. Is there any explanation for such
>contradictory results? Or is have I gone into some weird madness and
>have unreasonable expectations?
I dont know what is ltmps & ltest, I cant findout/reproduce that output,
but however my
octave 1> disp(arg(some_complex_vec) == arg(some_complex_vec))
seems to work fine.
Id probably be bothered about ltmps() & ltest are behaving ok
before pointing fingers elsewhere, and also why you forgot
to post the output of ltmps too.
Hope that helps.
-Muthu
- puzzling Octave behaviour, Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/22
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour,
Muthiah Annamalai <=
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour, Tom Holroyd, 2006/07/22
- Re: puzzling Octave behaviour, Francesco Potorti`, 2006/07/24
- checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Bill Denney, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Przemek Klosowski, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Francesco Potorti, 2006/07/24
- Re: checking for tiny inequalities (was: Re: puzzling Octave behaviour), Joan Picanyol i Puig, 2006/07/30