|
From: | Daniel Oberhoff |
Subject: | Re: print question |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:00:30 +0200 |
Am 26.06.2007 um 19:47 schrieb Matthias Brennwald:
I think it would be better to use gnuplot's pdf file generator.This assumes that gnuplot was compiled with pdf support. The eps -> pdf conversion should be retained for gnuplots without pdf support. Apart from that (regarding the original proplem): what if you save the figure to an eps file instead of pdf?
Yes, thats where it actually went wrong:
turns into:
gausmask_octave.eps
Description: PostScript document
looks like bilinear interpolation. Now, that can be useful, but it should be there as an option I think.
Daniel Oberhoff
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |