help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

fntest.m results in test directry on cygwin octave : check rand.cc


From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: fntest.m results in test directry on cygwin octave : check rand.cc
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:50:23 +0900 (JST)

Hello

I have not carried out make check on the cygwin because run_octave did not work.
Today I have found the test directory in the extracted source file directories 
and carried out the
'fntests'. 

********************************
Summary:

  PASS   2617
  FAIL      2

There was 1 expected failure (see fntests.log for details).

Expected failures are known bugs. Please help improve
Octave by contributing fixes for them.

1514 (of 1667) files have no tests.  Please help improve Octave by
contributing tests for these files (see the list in the file fntests.log).
error: can't perform indexing operations for <unknown type> type
*******************

I checked the fntests.log.
**************** 
>>>>> processing /usr/tatsu/cygwin/octave/octave-3.0.0/src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/rand.cc
  ***** test
 % Test fixed state
 randp("seed",1);
 assert(randp(1e9,1,6),[1000006208 1000012224 999981120 999963520 999963072 
999981440])
!!!!! test failed
error: assert (randp (1e9, 1, 6),[1000006208, 1000012224, 999981120, 999963520, 
999963072, 999981440])
expected
   1.0000e+09   1.0000e+09   9.9998e+08   9.9996e+08   9.9996e+08   9.9998e+08
but got
   1.0000e+09   1.0000e+09   9.9998e+08   9.9996e+08   9.9996e+08   9.9998e+08
values do not match
shared variables {
  __random_statistical_tests__ = 0
}
****************
So I have carried out.

octave:1>  randp("seed",1);
octave:2> format long
octave:5> assert(randp(1e9,1,6),[1000006208 1000012224 999981120 999963520 
999963072 999981440])
error: assert (randp (1e9, 1, 6),[1000006208, 1000012224, 999981120, 999963520,
999963072, 999981440]) expected
   1000006208   1000012224    999981120    999963520    999963072    999981440
but got
   1000006225   1000012251    999981100    999963538    999963053    999981432
values do not match

I think this difference is trivial and perhaps comes from the implementation of 
rand() function on
cygwin gcc is different from the gcc on other platforms.

Is this right? Can I ignore the difference?

Regards

Tatsuro
             

--------------------------------------
Easy + Joy + Powerful = Yahoo! Bookmarks x Toolbar
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]