|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave |
Date: | Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:12:31 -0400 |
On 18-Apr-2010, perseu.as wrote: | I think that GSL is more robust than Octave in this case. I think you mean that the GSL functions are more accurate for extreme values than the corresponding C or C++ library functions, at least as implemented in some versions of those libraries. jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |