[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:05:20 -0700 |
man, 19 04 2010 kl. 10:46 -0700, skrev Thomas D. Dean:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/post_bug.cgi, libstdc++ (43802).
In this report you have:
sinh (arg) = inf + inf * i
cosh (arg) = inf + inf * i
s/c = nan + nan * i (should be 1 + 0 * i)
(note that s = sinh (arg) and c = cosh (arg))
I don't understand why
(inf + inf * i) / (inf + inf * i)
should equal
1 + 0 * i.
I can understand why the 'tanh' call should give this result, but once
you actually evaluate 'sinh' and 'cosh' and perform the division
manually I don't see why you should get 1.
Could you elaborate on this?
Søren
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, (continued)
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Søren Hauberg, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Søren Hauberg, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Søren Hauberg, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Thomas D. Dean, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Judd Storrs, 2010/04/19
- Re: Same .m file: different results with different versions of Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/04/20