[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question on control-1.0.11 package
From: |
Lukas Reichlin |
Subject: |
Re: question on control-1.0.11 package |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:11:21 +0200 |
> On 24-Apr-2010, Huub wrote:
>
> | > [1]
> | >
> http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/extra/control-legacy/inst/tf2zp.m?revision=6995&view=markup
> | >
> |
> | Thank you. Remains the fact that Matlab gives the correct answer with
> | num = [0], apparently they have a catch for that.
>
> Seems like it would be easy enough to remove leading zeros from the
> numerator and denominator before proceeding with the rest of the
> function, so how about doing that and submitting a patch to the
> maintainer of the package?
>
> jwe
This [1] is how I solved the problem for the _new_ control package. Probably
there is a more elegant way to do it ...
Regards,
Lukas
[1]
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/control/inst/%40tfpoly/__remleadzer__.m?revision=6996&view=markup
- question on control-1.0.11 package, Huub, 2010/04/24
- question on control-1.0.11 package, Huub, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, Francesco Potortì, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, Huub, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, Lukas Reichlin, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, Huub, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, John W. Eaton, 2010/04/24
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package,
Lukas Reichlin <=
- Re: question on control-1.0.11 package, Huub, 2010/04/27