[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimisation / parallelisation Problems
From: |
somealias |
Subject: |
Re: Optimisation / parallelisation Problems |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:28:24 -0700 (PDT) |
This was exactly what I was looking for! I spent quite a bit of time looking
at pararrayfun / parcellfun examples but was still unsure how to convert my
code. I have since applied your code / example for two functions. I have
the following performance increases FYI and other interested readers:
Desktop: Mac Pro 2 CPUs (4 cores each) - total of 16 logical cores
(hyper-threading)
1. Dataset 1: 810 examples x 6,386 dimensions ~ 8.88x speed up
2: Dataset 2: 51,590 examples x 38,449 dimensions ~ 6.44x speed up
Thank you so much c.-2!
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Optimisation-parallelisation-Problems-tp4572922p4589312.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Optimisation / parallelisation Problems, Riccardo Corradini, 2012/04/24