[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Poor plot performance on Windows
From: |
tmacchant |
Subject: |
Re: Poor plot performance on Windows |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:03:40 -0700 (PDT) |
Jake wrote:
> Tried the same script on lubuntu, just as slow actually. I think
> ghostscript is the bottleneck.
Which test?
The test that Mike has shown draws a plot in interactive windows but not
into a file.
So ghostscript is irrelevant to the test and it cannot be the bottleneck.
The ghostscript is used to create png file from the postscript file on the
open GL based
graphics toolkit (qt and fltk) . And it also is used on gnuplot graphics
toolkit if gnuplot
used does not have cairo based terminals.
The gnuplot bundled with octave 3.8 or later does not have cairo based
terminal.
So I use gnuplot for windows from gnuplot official site setting
gnuplot_binary in ~/.octaverc.
Tatsuro
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Poor-plot-performance-on-Windows-tp4675531p4675584.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, (continued)
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jake, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Jake, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, tmacchant, 2016/03/16
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Mike Miller, 2016/03/17
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/03/17
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, PhilipNienhuis, 2016/03/17
- Re: Poor plot performance on Windows,
tmacchant <=
Re: Re: Poor plot performance on Windows, address@hidden, 2016/03/17