Re: cygwin RCS vs windows RCS

[Aaron S. Hawley]

You should get free software servers, instead.  There are a lot of pros to them.

Moving on... Cygwin's version of RCS is better because it is better
maintained than the old builds at Purdue.  The Cygwin environment will
also set up RCS correctly for you.  If there needs to be a fix to RCS,
Cygwin will make an upgrade available to you.

If you want commercial support for Cygwin, Red Hat can probably provide it.

http://www.redhat.com/services/custom/cygwin/support/

Why do you use RCS on your servers?  How do people interact with RCS
on the servers?  They don't connect to the server and run commands
from the shell, do they?

/a

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:49 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to install RCS on our windows servers and I see I have two options,
> do know the pros and cons of cygwin RCS and windows RCS.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rukiat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.



-- 
In general, we reserve the right to have a poor
memory--the computer, however, is supposed to
remember!  Poor computer.  -- Guy Lewis Steele Jr.