Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety

[Andreas Rottmann]

Raimund 'Raimi' Jacob <address@hidden> writes:

> i tend more to --enable-some-threadsafe-functions (definitly
> --enable-threads, because that's not true) and then use pthreads. pthreads
> is the way to go for multithreading and multithreaded systems without
> pthreads are not supported. i agree with rotty that there are probably
> none of them, anyway.
> 
That was the way I thought to go.

> the one thing that could change my mind is windoze: if there is no
> pthreads for windoze (not even from some 3rd party library) then those
> wrapper functions should be implemented.
> 
There is at least one free (LGPL) pthread implementations for windows:

http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/

Regards, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden        | address@hidden | 
address@hidden
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62