[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-smalltalk] Float comments
From: |
J Pfersich |
Subject: |
[Help-smalltalk] Float comments |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:02:19 -0600 |
Aren't these comments supposed to be different? Isn't FloatE a C float and
FloatQ a C long double? And should the precision not be mentioned as
they're different on my AMD64 beastie running a 64 bit Linux?
st> FloatQ comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st> FloatD comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st> FloatE comment !
'My instances represent floating point numbers that have 64 bits of
precision (well, less than that in precision; they are precisely the same
as C's "double" datatype). Besides the standard numerical operations,
I provide transcendental operations too.'
st>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Help-smalltalk] Float comments,
J Pfersich <=