help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Fwd: VisualGST Issues


From: Giuseppe Luigi Punzi
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Fwd: VisualGST Issues
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:18:49 +0200

Hi Gwenael,

Some news about this?

Cheers.

El vie, 28-05-2010 a las 09:15 +0200, Gwenaël Casaccio escribió:
> I will send a mail about the VisualGST state in the mailing list
> 
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>         On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 21:56, Giuseppe Luigi Punzi Ruiz
>         <address@hidden> wrote:
>         > Are this merged to test?
>         
>         
>         Not yet, I didn't get answers to the (implicit) questions I
>         asked.
>         
>         >> I have no problem upgrading to master for 3.2.1 if it is
>         better.
>         
>         
>         Is it better?
>         
>         >> - let's drop the stable branch for now and fix the above
>         issues on the
>         >> master branch.
>         >>
>         >> - as soon as master is ready to be imported into GNU
>         Smalltalk, Gwen
>         >> should do "git checkout stable; git merge -s ours master"
>         and push it. _Only
>         >> then_ I'll import it.  This will be a blocker for 3.2.1.
>         >>
>         >> - new features will _exclusively_ be developed on the
>         master branch.
>         >>
>         >> - bugfixes will _exclusively_ be developed on the stable
>         branch, and
>         >> merged from there into the master branch.  It's up to Gwen
>         whether he wants
>         >> to do the stable->master branch himself, or he prefers to
>         get two pull
>         >> requests.
>         
>         
>         Is this okay?
>         
>         
>         Paolo
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         help-smalltalk mailing list
>         address@hidden
>         http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
>         
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]