[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libthreads provenance
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: libthreads provenance |
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 2002 20:36:19 -0400 (EDT) |
> Ah, yes indeed, the CMU logs do establish it. Anyway, I think the
> only way to get the exact answer is to look at old MK releases. There
> aren't too many to check, MK79 was the first that supported i386.
If you locate MK79..MK81, let me know. I have not scoured for them,
but CMU doesn't have them anywhere obvious. (I didn't find MK82 at CMU
either, but elsewhere.)
> Why are we bothering at all, since this is soon-to-be-dead code anyway?
It currently looks like the Alpha port will be live before cthreads is
dead. We can drop in the alpha asm code and I've already done
warning-fixes for 64 bit nits. But I would be happier doing a true merge
with the exact CMU codebase that actually ran on Alpha.
- libthreads provenance, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/21
- Re: libthreads provenance,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: libthreads provenance, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/21