[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: anything wrong with libc?
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: anything wrong with libc? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:17:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:54:24AM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Are there any unresolved issues in glibc-2.2.x for the current and
> immediately anticipated Hurd code?
My last build had this at the top of the ChangeLog file:
2002-08-02 Roland McGrath <address@hidden>
* elf/Makefile ($(objpfx)interp.os): Depend on config.make,
since it sets the variables we use in a -D switch.
and that built and worked fine. From the look at the current CVS update,
only fr.po and sysdeps/unix/utime.c have changed, so I guess we are fine.
There are no outstanding issues for the 2.2 branch that I know of, and the
system has gotten some testing now.
> If there is no reason to wait, I will
> encourage a 2.2.6 release soon with the expectation that glibc-2.2.6
> verbatim will be good enough as is for Debian GNU/Hurd and that it will be
> the most likely yet to be the final and permanently sufficient 2.2.x release.
Yes. Although there is no need to worry deeply, if there is a minor glitch,
Jeff can get it into the Debian package as a glibc co-maintainer in Debian.
We can also start worrying about the HEAD banch as soon as you think it is
feasible.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/