[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PID of client requirements
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: PID of client requirements |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 04:03:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:52:40PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Ok, so the manager program is not something *we* are writing, but
> something that people commonly do write, using only Posix facilities,
> for particular cases, and in which they rely on this facility?
Yes.
> Such cases, it seems to me, mean that we probably do need some kind of
> PID validation. I'm not sure what the right strategy is, but I'll try
> and think of some.
Ok. Please do :) We all will try, too, and maybe we can cook something up.
Something like a PID authentication port to proc might do it (and proc needs
to implement something like the auth protocol).
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- PID of client requirements, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/11/04
- Re: PID of client requirements, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/11/04
- Re: PID of client requirements, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/11/04
- Re: PID of client requirements, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/11/05
- Re: PID of client requirements, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/11/05
- Re: PID of client requirements, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/11/06
- Re: PID of client requirements,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: PID of client requirements, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/11/07
- Re: PID of client requirements, Roland McGrath, 2002/11/07