[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failure emails assume nixpkgs changes are to blame
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: failure emails assume nixpkgs changes are to blame |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:53:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Under the assumption that build processes are deterministic, it just
>> lists all the committers to Emacs and/or Nixpkgs between the
>> last-known-good build and the failed build.
>
> But it doesn't, it only lists the Nixpkgs ones, that's my point.
> Eg see the input changes in http://hydra.nixos.org/build/6758185 .
> There were changes in emacs and nixpkgs, but only the nixpkg committer
> gets singled out for blame in the buildstatus email:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-buildstatus/2013-11/msg00000.html
Ah, got it; sorry.
Then I guess it’s a bug. Rob, Eelco?
(Note the manually-generated blame list here. ;-))
Ludo’.