RE: CVS: subject

[Furmaniuk, Michael]

  I use Outlook to direct easily on Sender and Body material, looking for
the keyword CVS and it works fine.  I don't see why people rely just on the
Subject line, even for Outlook.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Garrigues [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Li, Jerry
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: CVS: subject 


> From:  "Li, Jerry" <address@hidden>
> Date:  Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:25:42 -0400
>
> Hi, All:
> 
> We have been flooded by emails from the mailing lists of CVS, apache,
> tomcat, and so on. All of them come into our inbox, it is very tough to
> separate them. If you send an email with "CVS" in the subject, we could
> easily group them and redirect them into a dedicated folder. For example,
> Windows user may create a rule in outlook to redirect all emails with CVS
in
> the subject to a folder called CVS.

If you can't filter based on the envelop sender, you need a better filtering

program.  Let's keep the subject line for what it was intended for:
subjects.

Chris

-- 
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C                   
Austin, TX  78751-3709          +1 512 374 0500

  My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination.  For an
  explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html 

    Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
      but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.