[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative for binary files
From: |
Dominik Mierzejewski |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative for binary files |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 02:03:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Friday, 14 December 2001, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
> My company is currently using CVS to manage some third-party vendor
> really big, big tree with really many, many very big, big files.
>
> The result, obviously, is totally unacceptable. Even one of this
> files may take something like half an hour to check out, and that's
> for "just" around 20 MB.
>
> I've been investigating the Web for a (free software) alternative, but
> up to now found none.
>
> So the question is... is there in development for CVS any solution for
> this problem? Or do anyone here faced a similar problem *and* has
> found a reasonable solution? BTW, I only need versioning, not
> merging.
SubVersion looks promising, although it's not release quality yet.
It aims to be a better and complete CVS replacement.
http://subversion.tigris.org/
Next milestone (0.8) is due today...
PS. I'm in no way involved with the project, so please don't think it's
an advertisement of some kind.
--
"The Universe doesn't give you any points for doing things that are easy."
-- Sheridan to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Geometry of Shadows"
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann(at)we.are.one.pl>