[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: refactoring when using CVS
From: |
Glew, Andy |
Subject: |
RE: refactoring when using CVS |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:28:03 -0800 |
By the way, responding to those who say
"CVS is broken for XP".
Many people, myself included, think that
"Large-Scale C++ Software Design"
by Lakos is a good book.
Lakos highly advocates strict filenaming:
a class lives in a .cc/.hh file, and nowhere else.
And, similarly, that classes should be named
and renamed as appropriate.
If you want to be strict about such rules,
renaming happens a lot.
Can we then conclude that "CVS is broken for
Large-Scale C++ Software Design"?
;-}
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, (continued)
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Kaz Kylheku, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Christopher Randall, 2002/02/22
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Glew, Andy, 2002/02/25
- RE: refactoring when using CVS,
Glew, Andy <=
- RE: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26
- Message not available
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26
- OT: C++, yuck!, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Gianni Mariani, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/02/27
- Re: OT: C++, yuck!, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/27