[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: implicit directory umask?
From: |
Dusan Juhas |
Subject: |
Re: implicit directory umask? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:26:08 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Noel Yap wrote:
> --- Dusan Juhas <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a directory with permitions set to
> > drwxrwxrwx
> > in the cvs repository. After checkout to the sandbox
> > this directory is umasked to:
> > drwxr-xr-x
> > CVSUMASK is not set.
> > How it is possible?
> > Is there any implicit rule that says that checked
> > out directories should
> > be umasked? How to avoid this behaviour?
>
> CVSUMASK is used (if it's set) only within the repo.
> Within the working directory, your umask setting is
> used. What's the setting of your umask?
>
Yeah, that's it.
When I typed umask bash showed:
022
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
Dusan Juhas