[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tag vs rtag question
From: |
Nick Patavalis |
Subject: |
Re: tag vs rtag question |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:47:29 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:24:47PM -0700, Shankar Unni wrote:
>
> The problem was, if one of the files was *deleted* on the branch, cvs
> tag wouldn't move the tag for that file - you'd have to use cvs rtag for
> it. The developer in question had done separate "cvs rm"s on the
> mainline and the branch, but since the deleted version on the branch
> wasn't tagged, when I did the next merge from the branch to the
> mainline, the deleted file "reappeared".
>
Oh, I see. You mean that you were using the *same* tag-name and you
were just "pushing" it forward to more recent revisions, and that this
didn't behave well when the "push" was "crossing" a delete operation!
Tricky, indeed!
/npat
--
Don't ever think you know what's right for the other person.
He might start thinking he knows what's right for you.
-- Paul Williams, `Das Energi'
- Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, (continued)
- Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/22
- Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, Nick Patavalis, 2002/10/22
- Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, Greg A. Woods, 2002/10/22
- Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, Nick Patavalis, 2002/10/23
- tag vs rtag question, was Re: Merging from vendor-branch to branch, Todd Denniston, 2002/10/23
- Re: tag vs rtag question, Nick Patavalis, 2002/10/23
- Re: tag vs rtag question, Nick Patavalis, 2002/10/23
- RE: tag vs rtag question, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/23
- Re: tag vs rtag question, Nick Patavalis, 2002/10/23
- RE: tag vs rtag question, Shankar Unni, 2002/10/23
- Re: tag vs rtag question,
Nick Patavalis <=