[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:45:16 -0500 (EST) |
Richard Pfeiffer writes:
>
> In our case, as a refresher, our repository is prod. level NFS mounted
> on a dedicated NetApp disk and we have proven that in our case, this is
> much faster. So:
> 1) Would it still be advisable to try writing lock files to the local
> /tmp?
If your /tmp is on a memory-based filesystem like mfs or tmpfs, then
yes. If it's just a regular disk-based filesystem, probably not.
> 2) Could switching LockDir so that lock files are written to the local
> /tmp increase load on the local machine and increase our problem, since
> that's where our problems lie?
That's unlikely; writing to a memory-based filesystem shouldn't cause
any more load than writing to an NFS filesystem.
> 3) Or, would it be feasble to have LockDir point to a file across NFS,
> but outside of the repository? Of course then, we'd be are increasing
> NFS traffic.
How is that increasing NFS traffic? You're still doing exactly the same
operations, just in a different directory. In any event, that would
only help if the problem were disk contention on the NFS server, which
it isn't.
-Larry Jones
Let's just sit here a moment... and savor the impending terror. -- Calvin
- more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), (continued)
- more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/28
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/28
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Larry Jones, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least interesting though!), Tom Copeland, 2003/10/29
- Thx!, Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Larry Jones, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/29
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: more cvs performance questions (I think they are at least, Richard Pfeiffer, 2003/10/29
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima, 2003/10/30