[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary files bad idea? why?
From: |
Spiro Trikaliotis |
Subject: |
Re: binary files bad idea? why? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2004 06:24:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
Hello,
* On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 06:16:00PM -0400 address@hidden wrote:
> But if it wasn't marked as binary when it was checked in, the checked-in
> data may have been corrupted, so you have to check the file after changing
> the mode and redo the checkin if necessary.
This is no problem from my experience if the initial check-in was done
from a Unix (LF-) based system, but it is a problem if it was done from
a DOS (CR/LF-) based system.
Regards,
Spiro.
--
Spiro R. Trikaliotis
http://www.trikaliotis.net/
- binary files bad idea? why?, marko, 2004/05/19
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, Fouts Christopher (), 2004/05/19
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/19
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, Christopher.Fouts, 2004/05/19
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, address@hidden, 2004/05/19
- Re: binary files bad idea? why?,
Spiro Trikaliotis <=
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- Re: binary files bad idea? why?, Pierre Asselin, 2004/05/20
- RE: binary files bad idea? why?, Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/21