[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head
From: |
Jim.Hyslop |
Subject: |
RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2004 11:05:36 -0400 |
address@hidden wrote:
> Thank you very much!!! Like I said, this all make perfect sense to ME
> now.
Yep, I got that part. I was trying to provide you with some educational
tools :-)
> the pictures below will just add confussion
> (to THEM).
> But like me, hopefully in due time they'll catch on...
I wasn't sure if they'd help. I'll see if I can think of anything better.
Can you post a screen shot of the kind of branching they expect to see (or
email it to me directly if you don't want to post it publicly)?
--
Jim Hyslop
Senior Software Designer
Leitch Technology International Inc. (http://www.leitch.com)
Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com/experts)
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/19
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???),
Jim.Hyslop <=
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Carucci, Jason, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Jim.Hyslop, 2004/05/20
- RE: Branching bug ??? (was Re: Bug is tagging the head of a branc h head???), Carucci, Jason, 2004/05/20