[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?
From: |
Steve McIntyre |
Subject: |
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 00:58:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:20:33AM -0700, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
>Hi Stephanie,
>
>The information you are producing for me is not very helpful. :-(
>
>I have moved this discussion to the bug-cvs mailing list. For folks just
>joining this problem, look on the address@hidden list archives.
>
>Grasping at straws, the only change I see that might remotely have
>caused a change in behavior between cvs 1.12.9 and 1.12.13 is this one:
>
>2005-09-22 Derek Price <address@hidden>
>
> * classify.c (Classify_File): Consolidate redundant conditionals.
>
>Does the patch below fix your problem? (Sadly, this means you will need
>to (re)build CVS. If you are not able to build from the cvs 1.12.13a
>sources, this puts us in a bit of an impass as I have no windows boxes
>of any kind in my world...) If you are able to reproduce the problem on
>a Debian system, then things might be easier for you to track down.
I've tried the patch, but still no joy:
tack:/tmp$ cvs-1.12.13-markpatch -q up seyon1
RCS file: /home/cvs/seyon/Seyon.c,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
Merging differences between 1.37 and 1.38 into Seyon.c
rcsmerge: warning: conflicts during merge
cvs update: conflicts found in seyon1/Seyon.c
C seyon1/Seyon.c
tack:/tmp$ cvs-1.12.13-markpatch -q up seyon1
tack:/tmp$
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. address@hidden
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Stephanie Seibt, 2006/06/02
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Stephanie Seibt, 2006/06/02
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?,
Steve McIntyre <=
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/08
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/10
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07